<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Filmonic - Latest Comments in Heath Ledger&amp;#8217;s Final Movie Having Trouble Selling</title><link>http://filmonic.disqus.com/</link><description>Molesting your Film Shaft</description><atom:link href="https://filmonic.disqus.com/heath_ledger8217s_final_movie_having_trouble_selling/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 19:27:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Heath Ledger&amp;#8217;s Final Movie Having Trouble Selling</title><link>http://filmonic.com/heath-ledgers-final-movie-trouble-selling#comment-1540914</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@ joe   - very true but as the article says, this is more about Gilliam than anything else. Check out his back catalog and history.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some great (well, imo), original and quirky films that almost always have a hard time 'selling' or pleasing the studios. Time Bandits, Brazil, Fisher King, Twelve Monkeys, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.... all cult classics at this stage but none of them (with the possible exception of Monkeys) the sort of thing studios jump up and down for.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not to mention his Monty Python work. Being a Python = instant respect in my books.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I want to see this film. Ledger is an afterthought.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Flanagan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 19:27:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heath Ledger&amp;#8217;s Final Movie Having Trouble Selling</title><link>http://filmonic.com/heath-ledgers-final-movie-trouble-selling#comment-1540849</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It could very well deserve negative reviews and a small release. It's just a shame Heath Ledger's last film would end up that way. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liam</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 19:17:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heath Ledger&amp;#8217;s Final Movie Having Trouble Selling</title><link>http://filmonic.com/heath-ledgers-final-movie-trouble-selling#comment-1540824</link><description>&lt;p&gt;umm, it wouldn't be a shame if it deserved it?  Last I heard we don't rate movies because we feel sorry for people in them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joe</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 19:13:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heath Ledger&amp;#8217;s Final Movie Having Trouble Selling</title><link>http://filmonic.com/heath-ledgers-final-movie-trouble-selling#comment-1540728</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Poor Gilliam just doesn't get a break. Love (most) of his films... Brothers Grimm was a bit shit though. Got the impression he was doing that one to get on better terms with the studios, which obviously didn't work out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Still looking forward to Parnassus. When and however I get to see it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Flanagan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:54:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>