<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Filmonic - Latest Comments in Is 300 Getting A Sequel?</title><link>http://filmonic.disqus.com/</link><description>Molesting your Film Shaft</description><atom:link href="https://filmonic.disqus.com/is_300_getting_a_sequel/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:52:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is 300 Getting A Sequel?</title><link>https://filmonic.com/is-300-getting-a-sequel/#comment-11572850</link><description>&lt;p&gt;300: Last Man Standing...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JTS</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:52:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is 300 Getting A Sequel?</title><link>https://filmonic.com/is-300-getting-a-sequel/#comment-11572849</link><description>&lt;p&gt;agreed it was frank miller's 'vision' but it takes some kind of talent as a director to transform that into a film. personally i think they should leave 300 well alone... theres no additional material or feasable storyline i can see them using that would turn out good. What would be good is if they focussed on a different graphic novel by Miller.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Kennedy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:49:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>