<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Filmonic - Latest Comments in James Cameron Has Not Given His Blessing To Terminator Salvation</title><link>http://filmonic.disqus.com/</link><description>Molesting your Film Shaft</description><atom:link href="https://filmonic.disqus.com/james_cameron_has_not_given_his_blessing_to_terminator_salvation/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:24:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: James Cameron Has Not Given His Blessing To Terminator Salvation</title><link>http://filmonic.com/james-cameron-has-not-given-his-blessing-to-terminator-salvation/#comment-11573797</link><description>&lt;p&gt;haha ? the one who is posting the comments :D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kim walling</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:24:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: James Cameron Has Not Given His Blessing To Terminator Salvation</title><link>http://filmonic.com/james-cameron-has-not-given-his-blessing-to-terminator-salvation/#comment-11573796</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mayor McCheese could be directing for all I care as long as the movie is good.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LD</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:19:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: James Cameron Has Not Given His Blessing To Terminator Salvation</title><link>http://filmonic.com/james-cameron-has-not-given-his-blessing-to-terminator-salvation/#comment-2774299</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I apologise to anyone having trouble with the ad blocking the article. I had no idea it was active. Could you please tell me what ad it is and I will remove it immediately.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have made it my priority to never have ads within the content itself, so the fact that this has happened in annoying and I will try and get it sorted ASAP.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liam</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 06:55:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: James Cameron Has Not Given His Blessing To Terminator Salvation</title><link>http://filmonic.com/james-cameron-has-not-given-his-blessing-to-terminator-salvation/#comment-2773339</link><description>&lt;p&gt;one more comment on the annoying fucking ad you've got blocking your article. nice job.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stupid Ads</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 03:23:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: James Cameron Has Not Given His Blessing To Terminator Salvation</title><link>http://filmonic.com/james-cameron-has-not-given-his-blessing-to-terminator-salvation/#comment-2771947</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks so much for that fucking dish network ad that covers the T4 article and cannot, that I can tell, be closed.  I know sites need sponsors, but you need to remember that the content is why you get hits.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pissed off</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:12:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: James Cameron Has Not Given His Blessing To Terminator Salvation</title><link>http://filmonic.com/james-cameron-has-not-given-his-blessing-to-terminator-salvation/#comment-2767549</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why is your ad blocking the article?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?  It's so freaking annoying!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That's okay, though, I'll just read this on another site and never come back here. Morons.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Hillier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:31:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: James Cameron Has Not Given His Blessing To Terminator Salvation</title><link>http://filmonic.com/james-cameron-has-not-given-his-blessing-to-terminator-salvation/#comment-2766514</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You have ads on yr website tha6t do not let readers fully read your articles. very annoying.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">linus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:02:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: James Cameron Has Not Given His Blessing To Terminator Salvation</title><link>http://filmonic.com/james-cameron-has-not-given-his-blessing-to-terminator-salvation/#comment-2756097</link><description>&lt;p&gt;who the hell is this mcG guy? did he go the former artist known a s prince school use a symbol for a name? and who cares?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">terry</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:14:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: James Cameron Has Not Given His Blessing To Terminator Salvation</title><link>http://filmonic.com/james-cameron-has-not-given-his-blessing-to-terminator-salvation/#comment-2741819</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Irene, at issue is the film's quality- the legal issues are irrelevant. McG's claim was meant to imply that he and the script had been given a thumbs up by the person that made the first two movies great. But he lied. McG seems to have a knack for getting the cool, talented creative people pissed off- like the Spaced folks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:19:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: James Cameron Has Not Given His Blessing To Terminator Salvation</title><link>http://filmonic.com/james-cameron-has-not-given-his-blessing-to-terminator-salvation/#comment-2719341</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It does NOT matter if James Cameron Gave his blessing fer this movie or NOT. James Cameron Gave UP his right s to the movie when Schwartzenegger made the 3rd 1. Schwartzenegger from last anyone knew owned these rights. and he alone can choose who does the next.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irene</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 19:09:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>