DISQUS

Dominic Dagon · 3 weeks ago

That was it? What a rip off! she had herself covered the whole time! Not one tit :(
terry · 3 weeks ago

fuck that you telling me that crappy scene couldnt be in a PG-13 (12A) movie at all nothing about that could make the movie to beR-Rated. plus crappy McG hype that scene up for no fucking reason at all you cant even see her tits at all shes covering it up.
jacowium · 3 weeks ago

Almost a carbon copy of the Kelly McGillis/Harrison Ford scene in "Witness", except that in Witness you could actually see Kelly's breasts fully uncovered. This is rather disappointing, especially as I am a great admirer of Moon's beauty. Ah well, maybe next time.
atmblack03 · 3 weeks ago

There is something else behind cutting that scene, that is something you could see on cable television. Too much hype making it out like it was full frontal exposure of her breasts when in reality you get a side shot (barely even make anything out) and then the frontal she covers when it's close. They could have easily kept the scene and a pg-13.
Read the article on PG-13: http://www.parentalguide.org/movieratingsguide....
A PG-13 movie can have brief nudity, if it is in a non-sexual context; Titanic is a perfect example of this.