DISQUS

Lockdown · 8 months ago

It´s absolutely important that Kirsten Dunst should be in Spider-Man 4. Without her as Mary Jane then it´s not fully a Spider-Man movie.

StevooGer · 8 months ago

Well hope the "love" thingie doesnt become so over the top ridiculous as in Spiderman 3, but im looking forward to it...got a good feeling :)

ewwwwwww · 8 months ago

hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

rightone · 8 months ago

i think they should continue the venom story. make venom put parker thru so much

Derek · 6 months ago

The third Spider-man movie was completely worthless. First of all, Spider-man should focus more on action than romance. Secondly, and most important of all, you can't take a villain as popular as VENOM, and throw him into the last five minutes of the movie only to kill him off. That would be like taking the JOKER from Batman and only including him in the Dark Knight film as much as they did Two Face (Harvey Dent), which was also a somewhat disappointing move, but still Two Face is not as popular as the Joker. And besides, who's idea was it to make Sandman the pinnacle villain. Honestly, he is such a worthless and unimportant character to the Spider-man series. Pick Mysterio, Shocker, Vulture, or practically any other villain. They'll probably ruin the fourth Spider-man by making Carnage the villain now that they feel Venom played enough of a part.

Max · 6 months ago

Yeah, Spider-man 1 did a good job with Green Goblin, Doctor Octopus was fairly decent with Spider-man 2, then they totally screwed up Venom in the third. Made him a scrawny little screeching guy who always took off his mask. Not too mention he was barely in it. Probably right about the Carnage thing. Carnage is nowhere near as cool as Venom.