-
Website
http://filmonic.com/ -
Original page
http://filmonic.com/transformers-critics-didnt -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
anakin316
4 comments · 2 points
-
Rydeen
4 comments · 1 points
-
Dave Gonzales
5 comments · 1 points
-
honneybunny
3 comments · 1 points
-
thestrongestthereis
8 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
So, how much did New Moon make?
2 days ago · 17 comments
-
Michael Bay says Megan Fox has a “great part in Transformers 3″
2 days ago · 6 comments
-
Universal to release Kick-Ass overseas
3 days ago · 3 comments
-
International Percy Jackson & The Olympians trailer
3 days ago · 3 comments
-
You’ll never guess which movie Anne Hathaway might be joining!
3 days ago · 2 comments
-
So, how much did New Moon make?
And even after you go on that entire rant about megan fox. So what you're syaing is, you expected to go see a piece of crap movie (and you did), yet you feel the ened to defend it endlessly, becasue it qualified as having all the rights amount of cheese necessary, to entertain your quipped mind.
I don't know what's more useless, this film, or you! Now there's soemthing worth disccussing...but not really, no. "I not going to summarie the plot..because it doesn't matter" hahaha. Spoken like a true film sheep. How about you leave the critique-ing, to someone with a sensible opin.... someone with sense.
This is the popcorn flick of the summer and it did exactly that, it made me not even noticed I stuffed myself with a gallon of popcorn trying to not drool on myself as robots ninja kicked each other in the head, it was every 14 year olds wet dream and made every decepticon robo-geek probably want to open their mint condition in original package hasbro optimus prime action figure and stick in the microwave and to watch its face melt, while yelling "NOW GIVE ME YOUR FACE BITCH!! ...mindless fun at the end of the day is always FUN none the less!
Roger Ebert actually said something like this before, that plot should hardly matter in film.
the fact shows that the movie earns a lot.
and that's enough to shut roger's fucking mouth and yours if he would. (no point, coz you're no one).
and next time when u want to cry out loud bring ur mother with u
Ignore the wannabee movie critics who think they are cool by giving movies that can early billions a 1 star, go watch some artsy movie, this is a summer popcorn flick, sftu and eat your popcorn and enjoy the mindless action.
the 3 pices of pure sh*t u just said r for animalistic idiots like u dude go get some brain not some megan bitchin fox
That being said, Michael Bay doesn't make movies, he makes pornography and with most DVDs I'd watch running around $40 a pop, $12.50 is a steal to get my ya-yahs out.
I felt it was much better then the reviewers gave it credit for. I think you hit the nail on the head for the reason why it was given such bad reviews. Critics wanted a real movie, with a plot, character development, and emotion.
I wanted a to see Devastator tear apart some buildings, and Transforming robots kick the shit out of each other.
Guess who got what they wanted?
I also enjoyed the film because it went back to the cartoon roots alittle more. The Fallen, and Devastator. I loved Devastator.
I mean, if you even thought this movie was gonna be award worthy you should have stopped after you saw the cast - Shia Labeouf doesn't speak "Best Actor Oscar winner"
And one more thing, I will defend Michael Bay for as long as necessary. I enjoy all his movies, they may not have the best plot ROTF, or the best science - Armageddon, but they are damn entertaining. And in the end, isn't that the main reason why you see a movie?
Zero fucking star review
And If I here Shia Laboof say he's got something in is head one more fucking time, he'll have a bullet in his head.
Listen, just because you state a plot point for 2 and a half hours and go to robot heaven for a little bit, does not make for anything even remotely interesting, Get back to the giant robots. . . who are. . . hiding behind the army. . . or 6 inches from the camera so we can't tell wtf is going on.
I've never been so intensly bored. Fuck you and goodnight ladies and gentle man.
It conformed to the cartoon much better then the first Transformers movie, and even though was filled with lame jokes, it stayed true to it's roots with the semi there story that kinda made sense. That's impressive for a franchise that is entirely based on a toy.
However I can see how they have simply ignored pretty much the entire original Transformers storyline and are simply appealing to the casual audience with stuff constantly being blown up and seeing Megan Fox assests bound up and down (not that i'm complaining).
If you ask me they're milking the cash cow for all its worth, especially with such an open ending.
I wrote up a review here: http://filmvisuality.blogspot.com/2009/07/revie...
"Transformers 2 was like a turd put on screen. Then, they light it on fire, which is interesting for like a second. Then they keep lighting the turd again and again and you get really tired of seeing nothing but a flaming turd, at which point you realise that all you are watching is a piece of shit."