<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Filmonic - Latest Comments in Twilight Takes Potters Release Spot</title><link>http://filmonic.disqus.com/</link><description>Molesting your Film Shaft</description><atom:link href="https://filmonic.disqus.com/twilight_takes_potters_release_spot/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:13:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twilight Takes Potters Release Spot</title><link>http://filmonic.com/twilight-takes-potters-release-spot/#comment-1542511</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't get me wrong, I like Harry Potter, but moving back the release date is a smart move. First of all, at least it is months in advance. It is not like anybody has bought tickets or anything. For goodness sake, it is AUGUST not OCTOBER! Also, Twilight is liable to make a huge impact in the box office. Why would Warner Bros. want to compete with another large movie rather than make as much as they can no matter what. Plus, boycotting Warner Brothers due to one release dat change is the stupidest thing I have ever heard!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rachel</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:13:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twilight Takes Potters Release Spot</title><link>http://filmonic.com/twilight-takes-potters-release-spot/#comment-1541726</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm, I'm not that big a fan of either franchise, but  HP will make more money than Twilight, because it's more well known. Personally I would have made Twilight a winter release (like it's going to be), where there isn't much competition, because it's only real fan base is teen girls. And put HP out in the summer to compete with the other big movies. There's more money in it that way. You must remember Warner Bros, is a business and their aim is to make money. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lis</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 20:48:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twilight Takes Potters Release Spot</title><link>http://filmonic.com/twilight-takes-potters-release-spot/#comment-1540741</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think boycotting works with anything. I think that is childish. It's just a movie. I am a fan of Harry Potter films. Things change, deal with it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kathy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:56:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twilight Takes Potters Release Spot</title><link>http://filmonic.com/twilight-takes-potters-release-spot/#comment-1487277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As a Harry Potter fanatic, I will not boycott the Harry Potter films, there is no way I could do that,  but if Warner Brothers does not come through and release the film when they first agreed to, I will boycott  all other Warner Brothers films, and anything connected to Warner Brothers.  I think if all of the Harry Potter fans agreed to that, they would have to change their plans, and release the film as promised.  Warner Brothers knows that Harry Potter fans will go to the movie WHENEVER they release it,  so they think they hold all of the cards, but I don’t think they realize that if everything else was boycotted, they would stand to lose a substantial amount of dollars!!  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Teri </dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:22:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>